1) Biosecurity & Gain of Function Research is One of Biggest Threats We are Facing:
Robert Redfield Former Head of the CDC & Senator Rand Paul Raise Alarm
In a surprising Senate hearing that took place on July 11, Robert Redfield
called for a halt to gain-of-function research. Gain of function research are basically high risk experiments that involve making pathogens (viruses and bacteria) more infectious or deadly.
Many blame the spread of the covid virus on such risky research, with many pointing to the Wuhan laboratory in China.
Redfield, who led the CDC from 2018 to 2021, didn’t stop there. He said that biosecurity is “our nation’s greatest national security threat.”
“In 2024, 2025, biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat,” Redfield stated. “You need to think of it the same way we thought about the verge of nuclear atomic [sic] in the late 40s, 50s, and 60s.”
Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) agreed. “In my humble mind, a viral biosecurity issue is a bigger issue than China’s military threat to us.”
At the same hearing, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), proposed a new bill called the Ri sky Research Review Act . The bill aims to establish an independent review board to oversee federal funding for high-risk life sciences research.
“If the Risky Research Review Act had been in place, it might have prevented the COVID-19 pandemic,” Paul said, Redfield endorsed the bill.
Surprisingly Redfield went even further, admitting that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is “toxic to the body” and triggers “a very strong pro-inflammatory response.”
Vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D. , told The Defender , the independant online newspaper run by Robert Kennedy Jr. , “It’s important that he is telling the truth now. Adverse events were hidden and still are being hidden to prevent injection hesitancy.”
2) New Genetically Modified Pesticides Programmed to Genetically alter the Genes of insects but will they alter the genes of humans too?
In a potentially alarming development, the deregulation of gene-altering pesticides could expose humans and animals to serious risks without proper oversight. According to a report by Claire Robinson, a new wave of pesticides is set to change the traditional paradigm by genetically modifying organisms outdoors through methods like spraying, irrigation, or soil pellets. Advocates claim these genetic pesticides are more "environmentally friendly" than their chemical counterparts.
However, there is a major concern that using these pesticides can cause unintended consequences such as altering genes in unintended targets, such as humans, animals, and various environmental insects.
Altering the genetic makeup of these organisms could disrupt vital biological functions.
Highlighting these potential dangers is a recent study by an international team of scientists. Using computer modeling, they found that exposure to CRISPR/Cas gene-editing pesticides could inadvertently modify the genes of numerous non-target organisms, potentially leading to severe or fatal outcomes. Humans are particularly vulnerable to unintended genetic alterations.
The study methodically identified 18 species commonly found in agricultural environments, encompassing humans, livestock, major crops, wild plants, pollinators, predators, and soil organisms. They pinpointed three major pests likely to be targeted by outdoor-use genetic pesticides and selected specific genes known to be susceptible to CRISPR/Cas editing. Using publicly available software, they analyzed genomic regions in non-target species that could unintentionally be affected through contact, inhalation, or ingestion, via methods like irrigation and spraying.
Results revealed that 12 out of the 18 non-target species experienced unintended genetic alterations. These changes impacted crucial biological processes, from nervous system development in honeybees to cancer and hormone metabolism pathways in humans. Overall, 155 metabolic pathways were affected across the 12 species, with a notable impact on human genomes.
This study underscores the urgent need for comprehensive risk assessments before the widespread use of genetic pesticides in open environments. With potential hazards looming large, scientists and experts urge regulatory bodies to take a cautious approach and ensure robust monitoring and oversight to safeguard both ecosystems and human health.
Joseph's Organic Bakery